Subscribe here RSS Blog

Keeping light on our feet

by neilmorris | Feb 03, 2010

Agile project management may be nine years old this year, but its use is generally still restricted to software development. What would happen if you took the approach and applied it to public sector procurement?

The problems facing public sector procurement are pretty similar to those facing software back in 2001 - a bloated process which lasts too long, delivers at best last year’s solution, and thwarts innovation at every curve. So nine years ago the Agile Manifesto presented an alternative:

  • Interactions over processes and tools
  • Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
  • Responding to change over following a plan

Today public sector procurement is dogged by many of the same problems – lack of innovation, drawn-out timescales and solutions that are outdated before they’re implemented.

Agile procurement means adopting a more iterative approach to developing new public service delivery methods. It would enable purchasers to run multiple (small) pilots to see which innovative solution might offer the most promise, and then co-develop intellectual property with suppliers. It would allow procurement to specify the required outcomes of the project and then leave it to the supplier to define the most appropriate innovative solution.

Even tough EU procurement directives do not preclude using agile procurement methods. In fact the competitive dialogue process was introduced to open up procurement to more innovation, allow flexibility and an iterative approach.

Agile procurement is not a panacea. But in a time when significant cost reductions are required, radical innovation, not incremental change, is needed to get there. Agile procurement has a key role to play in public service delivery in the next decade.

This blog posting is a summary of a longer article exploring the benefits of Agile procurement. For a copy or more information, please contact Digital Public.

Bookmark and Share
alex | Mar 08, 2010
Neil

Last summer there was a google group led by James Darling. This followed one of the govt. bar camps. However we failed to get any department to take up the agile route.

Guess we could start again as they may well be more receptive now.

Tag cloud

Authors

Bill James
Bill James
Brian Oula
Brian Oula
Carol Chaffer
Carol Chaffer
Catherine Setchell
Catherine Setchell
Charlie Young
Charlie Young
Clare McKitrick
Clare McKitrick
Daniel Rider
Daniel Rider
Ed McLarnon
Ed McLarnon
Ed Luff
Ed Luff
Ian Pocock
Ian Pocock
Jamie Blissett
Jamie Blissett
Johan Hogsander
Johan Hogsander
Jonathan Akwue
Jonathan Akwue
Jonathan Peachey
Jonathan Peachey
Josh Feldberg
Josh Feldberg
Josh Greenberg
Josh Greenberg
Justin Irwin
Justin Irwin
Morgan Holt
Morgan Holt
Neil Campbell
Neil Campbell
Nick Insley
Nick Insley
Nick Russell
Nick Russell
Rob Millar
Rob Millar
Simon Clark
Simon Clark

>View all employees

Recent posts

From Youtube to YouView - the future of TV

From Youtube to YouView - the future of TV

by Rob Millar | Sep 02, 2010

Rob Millar provides an introduction to Project ...

Directgov review: call for feedback

Directgov review: call for feedback

by Clare McKitrick | Aug 17, 2010

Following the announcement that Directgov has ...

Innovation...on your bike!

Innovation...on your bike!

by Bill James | Aug 09, 2010

Bill James looks at innovation in cycling - are ...

Blogroll